DNC Chair Refuses to Rule out Accepting ‘Dark Money’ in 2016

‘We’re going to play by the rules as they exist now’

ANCHOR: "Would you tell your nominee not to accept dark money? Meaning, not the unlimited contributions that go to super PACs that are reported, but money that comes in via 501C3s. Would you urge that your nominee repudiate that and disassociate himself or herself from any of that money or advertising?"
WASSERMAN SCHULTZ: "Our position, as I said, is that we need campaign finance reform. That we need to have as much transparency written into the law, and into the Constitution if necessary, so that we can get that poisonous environment out. And we make sure that we know that voters can choose their candidates, and that you don't have donors buy their candidates, as Republicans support. But, at the end of the day, we're going to play by the rules as they exist now. And fight for the change that we know that will be better for our democracy."

Video files
Full
Compact
Audio files
Full
Compact
Similar stories
Feinstein: ‘$7 Million of Dark Money Was Spent to Sully Garland’ and 10 Million ‘to Promote Gorsuch’
Whitehouse: We’re Calling on Dark Money Groups Supporting Gorsuch to ‘Come Clean’ About Their Backers
Feinstein: With Nomination of Gorsuch, the ‘Spending of Dark Money Has Only Grown’
Democratic Senator Hopes Liberal Dark Money Groups Donate to His Campaign
Dem Senator Admits Dark Money Is a Problem on Both Sides of the Aisle