Townhall Participant to Pelosi: Shouldn’t There Be Proof of Russia Collusion by Now?

‘It takes time’


CUOMO: "What's your question?"
PELOSI: "Hi, Joshua."
MAN: "If Trump colluded with the Russians, why hasn't he been found guilty of it after a year of investigation? Wouldn't there be some type of concrete proof by now?"
PELOSI: "You know there is an investigation going on under Counsel Mueller and that's where, we wouldn't have any idea what is going on in that. Nor should we know what's going on in that investigation. But it is, it takes time. And I trust counsel Mueller and his work of the."

Video files
Audio files
Similar stories
FNC’s John Roberts: ‘Bit of a Leap’ for Trump to Say Manafort Case Proves There Was No Collusion
Tim Kaine: Brennan ‘Definitely Did Not Say that There Was No Collusion’
Turley: ‘Significant After a Year We Haven’t Seen’ Trump-Russia Collusion
MSNBC’s Katy Tur: It Doesn’t Matter If There Was No Collusion, Mueller Already Has ‘Quite a Bit’ on Trump
Huckabee on Warner Texts: ‘Appalling’ Dems Were ‘Desperately Looking’ to Prove Trump-Russia Collusion