Blumenthal: ‘There’s a Credible Case’ Against Trump for Obstruction of Justice

‘I think the president ought to be subject to the same scrutiny as anyone else in America’

EXCERPT:

BLUMENTHAL: "I think the President ought to be subject to the same scrutiny as anyone else in America, any other leader, whether it’s in entertainment, business, Congress, or sports. And that scrutiny ought to encompass investigation as appropriate. I am more focused on the investigation now underway in the Judiciary Committee into potential obstruction of justice. I think there's a credible case against Donald Trump on obstruction of justice and I think that Robert Mueller ought to be permitted to pursuit it. Legislation is necessary to protect that investigation in light of some of the very disturbing comments that have been made just within the past days by Republican colleagues on the House side about possible interference in that investigation." 

Video files
Full
Compact
Audio files
Full
Compact
Similar stories
Blumenthal: ‘Evidence Shows There Is a Credible Case of Obstruction of Justice Involving’ Trump
Dan Abrams on Case for Trump Obstruction: If BuzzFeed Report Is True, ‘This is Easy’
MSNBC’s Glenn Kirschner: Justice Department Likely ‘In Grand Jury’ Building a Seditious Conspiracy Case Against Trump
CNN’s Tapper: Obama Speech Shows Lack of Confidence in Hillary Clinton
Blumenthal: ‘There’s a Credible Case of Obstruction of Justice Against Donald Trump’