Cillizza on Trump’s Gillibrand Tweet ‘If It Doesn’t Have Sexual Innuendo To It, Then What Does It Mean?’

EXCERPT:

CAMEROTA: "There was no getting around that parenthetical suggestion of what Kirsten Gillibrand had suggested she would do for campaign contributions. To do point where Chris and I were reading, we had to stop just to each other, like wait, is that what that's saying? That's what that saying? There is no --"
CUOMO: "As usual, Alisyn assumed I was making it up at first." 
CAMEROTA: "I was, right."
CILLIZZA: "Wait the minute."
CAMEROTA: "Wait. It couldn't be that explicit. I couldn't believe it. But -- so the idea that the White House says that our minds are in the gutter, that means either they're tone deaf, that's the best possible reading of it, or they're fudging this again so that we don't believe our own --" [crosstalk] 
CILLIZZA: "Yeah. Well, I mean, look, I think the reality of Sarah Huckabee Sanders's job is Donald Trump does stuff and she finds ways to try to normalize what he does. I mean, I -- I -- she signed on for it and this is not an excuse, but -- but that's what she does. If 'and would do anything for it', the parenthetical there, if it doesn't have sexual innuendo to it, then what does it mean? I guess, I spent more time than I would like to admit yesterday trying to figure that."