Schiffer on DNC-Funded Trump Doc Leading to NSA Surveillance: ‘As a Patriot,’ this ‘Very Much Disturbs Me’

‘It would be tremendously hypocritical of the Clinton campaign to be pointing the fingers at Trump if in fact they were in any way complacent themselves’

This story is cross-posted at our consumer site, Grabien News. Watch it there – without audiomarks.

RUSH EXCERPT:

MacDONALD: "Okay Eric, here is what the controversy is about that the Democrats paid for an anti- trump file, that used Russians as its source. It’s unverified and the fear is that it could have led the FBI and the NSA to do surveillance on Trump Tower and unmask trump and his team what are your thoughts?"
SCHIFFER: "Well, as a patriot, the fact that this happened very much disturbs me and I think we need to understand. I don’t believe that any government that’s foreign should be working with the campaign in any capacity and certainly, it would be tremendously hypocritical of the Clinton campaign to be pointing the fingers at Trump if in fact they were in any way complacent themselves so this will be very fascinating to know. Mueller should be taking this up why should he not? This should be part of his investigation as well."
MacDONALD: "What do you think Angela?"
McGLOWAN "I think it should be and we’re talking about tax policy and I used to work on the ways and means committee, so American people, you’re paying for this nonsense. You have to take care of your card note, your mortgage, you have to pay your bills so you have the right to know. Russia doesn’t like us. Russia wants to take us over, China wants to take us over. We’re the experiment and you guys have the right to know and Mueller, my friend Eric you are correct should be taking this up well Elizabeth why isn’t he?"
MacDONALD: "It’s an interesting point and Eric quickly about that uranium one deal. Many in the media the liberal media saying this is a non-story it’s not a story but the Washington Post and the New York Times and news week broke the story about this a lot of information about this uranium one deal, sold the stake in 2007 and the company was sold to Russia in 2010 but still he had $131 million toward the Clinton Foundation charities and sat on the Clinton Foundation board."
SCHIFFER: "What I don’t understand, Liz, is how any governmental agency would have signed off on this. Why would you in any way want to give uranium to what is a government that is certainly not our friend and could be a grave enemy. That doesn’t compute and then certainly, you have these other questions. Now, the major donor certainly was far before any of this happened but there were other donors after this happened and around the time that it happened gave money to the Clinton Foundation and certainly—"
McGLOWAN: "But it’s play to pay see what I’m saying?"
SCHIFFER: "Well it could be."
McGLOWAN: "It’s quid pro quo."
SCHIFFER: "It could be, from an optics standpoint, it’s terrible. It’s just horrible looking and so if they were innocent of this, they should have been staying away. They should have been aware of how all this looks."

Video files
Full
Compact
Audio files
Full
Compact