Rep. Adams: Congress ‘Blatantly Violated the First Amendment Rights’ of Pigs-as-Cops Artist

‘Our government’s role is not to censor but to ensure that artists are able to freely express themselves without fear of censorship’

EXCERPT:

ADAMS: “And like the removal of the books from libraries, the removal of Mr. Pulphus’s painting was a blatant violation of the First Amendment right. The First Amendment guarantees that our government cannot make  substantive decision about a work of art. Expression can only be limited if and only if that expression will cause direct and imminent harm, such as yelling fire in a crowded theater. Our government’s role is not to censor but to ensure that artists are able to freely express themselves without fear of censorship, and our government did not protect this young man’s First Amendment rights. Instead, it acted as a retroactive censor on his work." 

Video files
Full
Compact
Audio files
Full
Compact
Similar stories
Rep. Castron: Trump Revoking Brennan’s Clearance Is an ‘Abuse of Power and Violates His 1st Amendment Rights
Joe Concha: ‘A Threat to the First Amendment Doesn’t Happen’ When Trump’s ‘Mean’
Dershowitz on AMI/Bezos: ‘You Can Both Be an Agent, If That’s True, and You Can Also Be Exercising Your First Amendment Rights’
Trump on Johnson Amendment: ‘This Financial Threat Against the Faith Community Is Over’
Black Lives Matter Founder Claims Hate Speech Isn’t Protected by First Amendment