Fox’s Jarrett on Trump Removal Under 25th Amendment: I Wonder If They Can Even Read

GUILFOYLE The bill appears ░░░░░░░░ be gaining support from ░░░░░░░░ in the House Over ░░░░░░░░ liberal lawmakers are now ░░░░░░░░ a plan that would ░░░░░░░░ an oversight commission to ░░░░░░░░ if the President is ░░░░░░░░ or physically unfit to ░░░░░░░░ which could then lead ░░░░░░░░ his removal under the ░░░░░░░░ Amendment Joining me now ░░░░░░░░ reaction Fox News medical ░░░░░░░░ Dr Marc Siegel and ░░░░░░░░ News anchor and attorney ░░░░░░░░ Jarrett Good evening to ░░░░░░░░ gentlemen Yes this is ░░░░░░░░ real story that we ░░░░░░░░ reporting on I ll ░░░░░░░░ to you Gregg about ░░░░░░░░ legal aspect of it ░░░░░░░░ anything like this ever ░░░░░░░░ done before JARRETT No ░░░░░░░░ is no legal precedence ░░░░░░░░ it Section 4 which ░░░░░░░░ be the involuntary invoking ░░░░░░░░ the 25th Amendment The ░░░░░░░░ who are advocating this ░░░░░░░░ wonder if they can ░░░░░░░░ read Have they read ░░░░░░░░ 25th Amendment Sheila Jackson ░░░░░░░░ congresswoman says The President ░░░░░░░░ ill suited and incompetent ░░░░░░░░ invoking the 25th Amendment ░░░░░░░░ demanded Well even if ░░░░░░░░ were incompetent that s ░░░░░░░░ the legal basis for ░░░░░░░░ It has to be ░░░░░░░░ incapacity somebody who has ░░░░░░░░ stroke somebody who has ░░░░░░░░ accident or in the ░░░░░░░░ of JFK what if ░░░░░░░░ had survived but was ░░░░░░░░ damaged That s how ░░░░░░░░ all came about So ░░░░░░░░ either misunderstands or misinterprets ░░░░░░░░ one or the other ░░░░░░░░ think she just doesn ░░░░░░░░ like this particular president ░░░░░░░░ doesn t like his ░░░░░░░░ The only mechanism for ░░░░░░░░ there is called the ░░░░░░░░ box it s an ░░░░░░░░