To access this clip without audiomarks, please purchase it, or upgrade your account.
Date
Summary
Sen. Feinstein: Roe v. Wade Is Now a ‘Super Precedent’
Subjects
Source
C-SPAN2
Name: C-SPAN2
URL: https://www.c-span.org/live/?channel=c-span-2
Show
Gorsuch Confirmation Hearing, Day 1
Name: Gorsuch Confirmation Hearing, Day 1
Persons
Dianne Feinstein, Neil Gorsuch
Name: Dianne Feinstein
Employment: U.S. Senate
Position: Senator
Name: Neil Gorsuch
Employment: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Position: Federal judge
Event location
Washington, D.C.
Name: Washington, D.C.
URL: http://dc.gov/DC/
Link
–
Uploaded
03/20/2017 11:46 am
Owner
Tom (staff)
Type
Video
Format
MP4 (720x400)
Use clipper to adjust file type
Duration
0:01:36
Views
586
Purchases
6
Transcript
FEINSTEIN Thank you If ░░░░░░░░ judgments when combined do ░░░░░░░░ constitute super precedent I ░░░░░░░░ t know what does ░░░░░░░░ the dozens of cases ░░░░░░░░ Roe are not only ░░░░░░░░ precedent They are also ░░░░░░░░ a woman s fundamental ░░░░░░░░ constitutional rights Roe ensured ░░░░░░░░ women and their doctors ░░░░░░░░ decide what s best ░░░░░░░░ their care not politicians ░░░░░░░░ Trump repeatedly promised that ░░░░░░░░ judicial nominees would be ░░░░░░░░ life and quote automatically ░░░░░░░░ quote overturn Roe V ░░░░░░░░ Judge Gorsuch has not ░░░░░░░░ occasion to rule directly ░░░░░░░░ a case involving Roe ░░░░░░░░ his writings do raise ░░░░░░░░ Specifically he wrote that ░░░░░░░░ believes there are no ░░░░░░░░ to the principle that ░░░░░░░░ the intentional taking of ░░░░░░░░ human life by private ░░░░░░░░ is always wrong end ░░░░░░░░ This language has been ░░░░░░░░ by both pro life ░░░░░░░░ pro choice organizations to ░░░░░░░░ he would overturn Roe ░░░░░░░░ Supreme Court is also ░░░░░░░░ to decide what kind ░░░░░░░░ reasonable regulation states and ░░░░░░░░ can implement to protect ░░░░░░░░ neighborhoods and schools from ░░░░░░░░ violence.”
To view this clip's transcript, log into your Grabien account.